Peer Review Policy

• The journal adopts a Double-Blind Peer Review system, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure complete impartiality in evaluating scientific rigor.
• Each article undergoes an initial screening by the editorial board to ensure its suitability for the journal's scientific scope; after preliminary acceptance, it is sent to at least two experts in the precise field of specialization.
• The final publication decision depends on the reviewers' reports, which examine the originality of the idea, the accuracy of the methodology, the validity of the results, and the up-to-dateness of the references, while providing authors with sufficient opportunity to make the required amendments.
• Editorial board members and management staff are committed to maintaining the confidentiality of information regarding the identities of reviewers and their scientific opinions to ensure the independence of the evaluation process.
• The journal is committed to completing the review process with high professionalism and within specified timelines that guarantee the researcher's right to prompt procedures and the quality of the scientific output.